Analysis of Normal and Superconducting Coplanar Waveguides in Radio Astronomy
Keywords:
coplanar waveguides, kinetic inductance detector, complex conductivity, critical temperature, gap frequencyAbstract
In terahertz radio astronomy, superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators have been commonly applied in Kinetic Inductance Detectors (KIDs) to measure the absorption of photon energy in the millimeter and submillimeter bands. Here, we present an analysis on the performance of superconducting niobium coplanar waveguides (CPWs). To compute the loss in a superconducting CPW, we have incorporated the complex conductivity developed by Matis and Bardeen based on the superconducting BCS theory, into the CPW loss equation. We have made a comparison between the loss in a CPW at room temperature with that below the critical temperature Tc of the superconductor. It can be observed that at frequencies below the gap frequency fg, the low in the superconducting CPW is significantly lower than that in a normal CPW. Above fg, however, the material loses its superconductivity and the loss in both temperatures becomes comparable. In our analysis, we have also shown that the loss decreases as the gap bewteen the strip and groundplane becomes wider. Hence, with careful design, the loss in a CPW can actuall y be minimized.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
1. The author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. The author(s) are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
3. The author(s) warrants that the article is substantially different from any that the author(s) have already published elsewhere.
4. The author(s) have not sent this article or any article substantially the same as the one named above for publication elsewhere.